Facism in America :: essays research papers

Since mainstream left-liberal media do not seriously ask this question, the analysis of what has gone wrong and where we are heading has been mostly off-base. Investigation of the kinds of under-handed, criminal tactics fascisticic authoritiess undertake to legitimize their agenda and accelerate the rate of change in their favor is dismissed as indulging in "conspiracy theory." Liberals insist that this regime must be treated under the rules of "politics as usual." But this doesnt consider that one election has already been stolen, and that Septembers repeat of irregularities in Florida was a conduct warning that more such thuggery is on the way. If the "f" word is uttered, liberals are quick to note certain obvious dissimilarities with previous variants of fascism and say that what is happening in America is not fascist. It took German justice minister Herta Daeubler-Gmelin to make the comparison explicit (under present American rules of political discours e, she has been duly sacked from her cabinet post) only when at the liberal New York Times or The Nation, American writers dare not speak the truth. The masked assertion that we are immune to the virus ignores degrees of convergence and distinction based on the individual patients history. The Times and other liberal voices have been obsessed over the last year with the rise of minority fascist parties in the Netherlands, France, and other European countries. They have questioned the tastefulness of new books and movies about Hitler, and again demonized such icons of Nazism as Leni Riefenstahl. Is this perhaps a displacement of American anxiety onto the safer European scene, liberal intellectuals here not wanting to confront the troubling truth? The pace of events in the last year has been almost as blindingly riotous as it was after Hitlers Machtergreifung and the consolidation of fascist power in 1933. Speed stuns and silences.The proposed Iraqi adventure, which is only the fir st step in a more compulsive militarist agenda, has been opposed by the most conservative warmongers of past administrations. If the test of any theory is its predictive capacity, Bushs extreme risk-taking is better explained by the fascist model. strictly economic motives are a large part of the story, but there is a deeper derivation that exceeds such mundane rationales. Several of the apparent contradictions in Bushs organisation make perfect sense if the fascist prism is applied, but not with the normal perspective. To pose the question doesnt mean that this is a completed project at any point, anything can happen to shift the course of history in a different direction.